Two Friendly Queries for Dr John Coleman
By Will Banyan
Copyright © 26 April & 3 May 2008
Author’s note: Two open letters to Dr John Coleman, the allegedly former MI6 agent and originator of the “Committee of 300” conspiracy theory, that were published on the now defunct Martin Frost website in 2008. At issue were two claims made by Dr Coleman to have been the first to have revealed to the public, the existence of the National Reconnaissance Office and the Club of Rome, but in each case the mainstream media had clearly reported on the existence of these bodies first. Nevertheless, Dr Coleman never responded to my queries, nor has he tried to correct his demonstrably false claims.
[26 April 2008]
Dear Dr Coleman
Dr Coleman (incidentally, where did you get your PhD and what was it for?), I write to you as a humble novice in the areas of intelligence, but as you may have noticed I like to get to the bottom of things and don’t believe everything I’m told.
So it is in that spirit that I note that in your speech from 1994, helpfully put on YouTube that you are quick to establish your credentials versus those of others (presumably journalists) who dare to write on matters involving intelligence organizations. Such people, you state [starting at 7:20], “really have no experience whatsoever” on intelligence matters. As an example of your own experience and reliability on these sensitive issues, you describe your apparent scoop in your book on Mind Control, Metaphysic, Extremely Low Frequency and Weather Modification apparently on July the 8th, 1986:
I said the top-level intelligence organisation in the US was the National Reconnaissance Office. Far bigger than the CIA and any of the other intelligence agencies. And I even had the audacity to give the address of this organisation.
You then added, somewhat triumphantly, that some eight years later, ABC was finally carrying a story on the NRO. Thus this was proof that on matters involving the intelligence agencies: “I know that of which I speak….”
But, on your website, you include an endorsement from a very obscure but obviously very learned Professor Carlos St. John Reuterman (where does he teach and what has he written?). In singing your praises, Reuterman makes a similar claim:
[Coleman] has produced World in Review, (WIR) a bimonthly news magazine since 1970. The magazine has hundreds of ‘First’ reports to its credit like the very first report ever to appear in print about the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) published in WIR in 1983, five years before CBS broke the story as a ‘scoop’ in the ‘CBS Evening News.’
If I had any idea who Professor Reuterman was I am sure that I would feel privileged to receive such praise. But reviewing newspaper records from the 1980s seems to pour some very cold water on your (conflicting) claims to have scooped the mainstream media on the existence of the NRO in 1983 (or was it 1986?).
Now in your 1994 speech you claim to have beaten the mainstream media to the punch with your 1986 revelation about the very existence of the NRO. If you are inclined to stand by that statement you made 14 years ago [now obviously 20 years ago] as an example of your credibility and inside knowledge, I presume you were aware of an article in the New York Times on January 13, 1985, by James Bamford, titled “America’s Supersecret Eyes in Space.” Bamford’s article included the following revelation:
For nearly a quarter of a century, the N.R.O. has been responsible for managing the nation’s growing fleet of spy satellites – at least one of which will be firmly secured to a pallet in Discovery’s cavernous cargo hold. For the same period, America’s reconnaissance-satellite program has been hidden under a heavy layer of security classifications and code names, such as Byeman and Top Secret Ruff. Since its establishment on Aug. 25, 1960, the N.R.O. has been an entirely ‘’black’’ organization: The Federal Government has never admitted that it exists, and its name is officially secret.
If Reuterman is correct that you first reported on the NRO in 1983, his assessment that it was “the very first report ever to appear in print” on the NRO is also inaccurate. I draw your attention to a 1500 word report in the New York Times of March 1, 1981, which opened with the following paragraphs:
SECRECY OF U.S. RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE IS CHALLENGED
By PHILIP TAUBMAN, Special to the New York Times
WASHINGTON, Feb. 28
The exceptionally secret status of the National Reconnaissance Office, one of the nation’s most expensive and sensitive intelligence organizations, is likely to be reviewed by the Reagan Administration, according to senior Government officials.
At present, even the existence of the office is officially classified. In the intelligence community, it is known as a ‘’black’’ operation, meaning that nothing about its work or the identity of its officials is subject to public scrutiny.
The mission of the office, according to scarce reports that have arisen over the years, is to oversee the development and operation of spy satellites used to photograph foreign territory and to monitor international communications.
Its budget, which is hidden in Air Force operations, exceeds $2 billion a year, according to Government officials. By comparison, the budget of the Central Intelligence Agency is about $1 billion…
It would appear that the good professor, wherever he is situated, was mistaken in claiming that your publication was the first to reveal the existence of the NRO. What appeared in the WIR was most certainly not, “the very first report ever to appear in print about the super-secret National Reconnaissance Office.”
My query Dr Coleman, is how do you explain this apparent discrepancy between what your website claims and what the public record suggests? And if you knew Professor Reuterman was wrong, why did you continue to carry his endorsement on your website? As for your lecture in 1994, why did you suggest the ABC report on the NRO that was evidence of the mainstream media’s tardiness, even though the New York Times had made substantial reports on the NRO in 1981 and 1985?
Dr Coleman, I am sure that you realise that this is not a trivial matter, but one that goes to the heart of claims by yourself and others about your credibility, and I am confident that will you give this the attention it deserves.
[03 May 2008]
Dear Dr Coleman,
As I wait patiently for an answer to my first query, Dr Coleman, I find whilst perusing the 1992 edition of your signature work, Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300, a number of curious claims that seem to warrant further questions and queries.
For example, in the “Forward” you describe yourself as a “professional intelligence officer”, presumably with MI6, and that you served as a “political science officer” whilst in the field in Angola. Do you have any documentary proof you served with the MI6? Were you declared or undeclared? I ask this because such details seem to be missing from your books and website. Even the late William Cooper was able to furnish details proving, at the very least, that he served in the US Navy. From you, thus far, there has been nothing. Not even a piece of paper proving you served Her Majesty’s Government in any capacity. It would do wonders if you could rectify this.
On page 1 you state that on “30th April, 1981” that you “wrote a monograph disclosing the existence of the Club of Rome identifying it as a Committee of 300 member.” Far be it for me to quibble, Dr Coleman, but given that the Club of Rome was formed in 1968 by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King, and that it published its first book, The Limits to Growth in 1972, it would seem that its existence had been “disclosed” to the public well before your, no doubt excellent, monograph appeared. I trust you’ve revised that sentence accordingly in the most recent edition of this book.
As for your statement on the following page: “This was the first mention of both these organisations in the United States.” I beg to differ. While your monograph may well have been the first to mention the existence of the “Committee of 300” in the US, I’m afraid that you will find throughout the 1970s, plenty of newspaper articles about the Club of Rome, including numerous reviews of The Limits of Growth. For example, on the Google News Archive Search one can find 70 reports on the Club of Rome in 1972, most of them in US newspapers. This includes one report in the New York Times on February 27, 1972 titled: “Club of Rome a Worldwide Organization.”
Evidently you were not the first. In fact your disclosure about the Club of Rome came nine years too late. I’m puzzled by this, Dr Coleman, that a man with your qualifications and obvious library skills would make this error. Did the British Museum not have the New York Times on microfilm?
I look forward to your response, in the meantime I will peruse your book some more to see what documentary evidence you are able to furnish for the existence of the “Committee of 300.”
Here’s some interesting background on Coleman from Eustace Mullins (who was there when Coleman appeared out of nowhere). Seems Coleman was reluctant to provide any sort of proof, from the start, that he was who he said he was.
The totality of his output directly stems from Larouche material, to the point of plagiarism (as Mullins realized too); so much so that the Larouche gang had to have been behind him in the first place. I don’t think they would stand by and let someone crib their entire conspiracy oeuvre, and pass it off as his own. The only unique thing he’s offered are the words “Committee of 300,” but even his synonymous name for that fabled monolithic cabal, the Olympians, can be traced back to Larouche and company.
From the Larouche Watch site:
Didn’t author Spiridovsky mention a ‘commitee of 300’ in his work, specifically originating in Germany?
Who is Spiridovsky and what work are you specifically referring to?
I believe Winston is referring to Count Arthur Cherep-Spiridovich, author of “The Secret World Government Or the Hidden Hand: The Unrevealed in History,” published in 1925. The book is now in the public domain. In this book, Count Spiridovich claims that a secret group of 300 Jewish businessmen and bankers have formed what the author calls the “hidden hand,” which Spiridovich sometimes refers to in the book as the “300”.
To my knowledge Spiridovich is the first person to combine the Freemasons, The Illunimati, Jews, the Rothschild family, and Satan into one giant super conspiracy. After reading Spiridovich’s book, one can easily come to the conclusion as to where Dr. Coleman got the idea for the “Committee of 300”. That Dr. Coleman knows about Count Spiridovich is clear from Dr. Coleman’s book “The Rothschild Dynasty”. Dr. Coleman uses Count Spiridovich’s book as a “source” for information concerning the Rothschild family. Of course, the information contained in “The Secret World Government” is mostly false and an exercise in extensive quote mining. It is also blatantly antisemitic.
Anything written by Dr. Coleman is an exercise in intellectual and historical dishonesty.
Thanks for the response. It seems you’re right. All kinds of references to the 300 “Hidden Hand” “Judeo-Mongols.” It’s really a vile book, in the vein of a William Guy Carr, with two or three errors of fact in every sentence of every page.
Truth — real truth — has always been an elusive concept. Also always, have been persons making claims — often about their credibility and importance — that turn out to be deliberately exaggerated, self-aggrandizing in nature or outright false.
Think of the war veteran wearing medals not earned.
When a person lies about small matters, be rest assured they will lie about other matters — often the big ones.
Such misrepresentations are a clear demonstration of character.
I would be very interested to know if Dr Coleman has responded to the allegations of dishonesty and self-promotion contained herein — and if he is even aware of this challenge.
Can any viewer furnish any information?
My email address is: email@example.com
Meanwhile, I will make an attempt to locate a reliable email address to forward the content to Dr Coleman.
Yes, the late Eustace Mullins and Lyndon LaRouche claim (Executive Inttelligence Review) that Coleman plagerized their ideas, information and works. Mullins wrote his article about Coleman in 1992. Here are my concerns about Coleman:
1. His educational background
If Coleman really worked for MI6 as an information officer, he would have graduated from Oxbridge and earned his DPhil (PhD) there. MI5 & MI6 have accepted only Oxbridge graduates as high-ranked officers. But, he stated he used to study at the British Museum for 5 years and earned his doctorate in history and social science.
He also wrote that (to investigate John Cecil Rhodes) ”From unpublished documents, Dr. Coleman researched at Oxford, the British Museum and on location in South Africa. ”
As Will asked at first, I would like to know his educational background.
2. About his location
He used to live in Carlson City, NV, the U.S. for many years. If you can check the location by google’s photo mapping, there are only a few junk food stores (like KFC). I am so curious if he really used to live there for several decades. How did he gain the latest information from others (except plagerizing other works)?
If someone have more information about Coleman, please share. Thanks.
That link literally has everyone on every continent who has earned a PhD going back to the 1950s or 40s. I always check there whenever a claim is made. There’s no John Coleman who earned a PhD from any school in England – ever. Plenty from other places like America though.
Terry, thank you for your reply and info.
I think what Mullins and LaRouche (EIR) claim is correct. Coleman would not hold his PhD and worked for MI6. Rather, he may be one of the conspiracy theorists who try to agitate real info.
The purpose of pseudo-conspiracy theorists is to misguide people. They may be agents of Rothschild or Rockefeller.
If you goodgle ‘David Icke freemason’, ‘David Icke freemason’, you will learn they are fake conspiracy theorists who provide half-real info and half-false info with people.
The books by Coleman and Icke are already translated from English to Japanese. Ironically, Coleman’s books are popular in Japan.
Also, there are some conspiracy theorists in Japan such as Kaoru Nakamura, Benjamin Fulford, and Richard Koshimizu.
Nakamura claims she is a grand daughter of the late Meiji Emperor and describes herself as Princess Nakamura. Actually, she does not have any kinship with the Japanese royal family. She is an espionage of Rothschild, Rockefeller, and North Korea.
Probably, other two guys would be the same.
How can you be absolutely sure about David Icke not being what he says he is?
On guy on the good side.
The above reply was to Ryu Soeno, not Jackie!
One needs the title of the dissertation in order to effect the search!
Do you have it?
(It looks like the reply was posted arbitrarily somewhere else!)
One needs the title of the dissertation in order to effect the search! Do you have it?
Thank you, contributors for your info on Coleman. I just bought his book based on many pieces, congruent events and other info by many like Carroll Quigley. Although it is/would be phenomenally difficult to believe that world control, to a level Coleman describes, exists or could with so few in control, all indications I have learned indicate it’s very possible, even likely. But with your contentions here I am somewhat relieved that it is less than he claims. However, for me I remain “at the drawing board”.
John Coleman is an alias, clowns!…do more research first, ok!
So that makes all his false claims to prescience OK then? So it’s not Fake News if the man is a fake to begin with?
Micky mouse..why don’t you just say what you know. Moron.
Sure does look foolish assuming that that is his real name. The piece is amateur”ish” and I suspect this is why it was never responded to. Either that or this is paid intervention as the seo work is beyond suspicious.
It was never responded to because Coleman can’t defend himself.
World intelligence review, inc Las Vegas registered with sec of state (status revoked) by lena clarke P O BOX 27740, LAS VEGAS, 89126, NV. Corp agent NCH @ 4730 S. FORT APACHE RD SUITE 300, LAS VEGAS.
BERNSTEIN INTELLIGENCE, LLC registered with same POBOX and same agent above but also lists a manager name of STANLEY CHILDRESS (old English Anglo Saxon name ). Could this be Dr John (middle name possibly peter) coleman?
I also find another company with intelligence in name at the same P.o. box INNATE INTELLIGENCE, INC, managing agent SETH L PRATT, but owner names Vietnamese.
I don’t know. Difficult to find Dr John coleman!
He seems to have dropped off the face of the earth, or least taken down his website. Perhaps he has retired from this line of “work”.
Perhaps the host of Veritas (not project Veritas) can find him. Alex Jones interviewed coleman a long time ago followed by Veritas about 6 years ago if memory serves. I don’t want to pay a subscription fee at this time to pursue Veritas as I don’t have enough time to invest in conspiracy stuff. I’m already so busy keeping up with the coup against our president Trump. My gut tells me Coleman is sincere, and perhaps he just used an alias to hide his identity. Honestly, registering through Las Vegas and LLC and using a PO box, everything about him is alias.
I presume that the messenger is not as important as the message which he successfully relayed. I would really like to hear his current view of our president circa 2019.
The interview can be found here. Coleman starts by accusing David Icke of plagiarizing his work and being one of the “worst plagiarists” out there!
I contacted the individual who goes/went by the name of Dr. John Coleman several years ago. I sent him a copy of a hard-to-find book that he was very interested in reading and exploiting. The old bugger never returned my copy. At the time, he mentioned that he had been in a serious car accident and he also mentioned his son. He said that he was living in Nevada at this time.
I asked him if he knew anything about the Rothschild family’s connections to the Vatican through loans that the Rothschilds had made to the Holy See. He claimed that he had written a book about the Rothschilds and that he had never come across that information in his research.. He said that his book on the Rothschilds was not available in America. Of course it is fairly well-known now that the Rothschild’s lent money to the Vatican over the years (q.v., Wikipedia: “Rothschild loans to the Holy See”). I do not believe that he ever wrote a book on the Rothschilds.
I met Eustace Mullins at a conference in California in June of 2002. I spent over an hour with him and two others, one of whom was the late Anthony Hilder who interviewed Mr. Mullins at that time. Eustace Mullins was a gentleman and had a look of sincerity in his eyes. I would certainly trust him over the character Dr. John C. Coleman.
I do not know to a certainty what Mr. Coleman’s motives are/were. However, based on my experience with him, I strongly suspect that he was just another con-artist who was in the conspiracy field for the money. He thrived until the internet produced too much competition for his over-priced reports. The so-called conspiracy field has seen many of these shady characters over the years. He was the type that leaned on gullible old ladies as sources for his funding – he inferred as much to me in a conversation that I had with him over the telephone. In my opinion, Dr. John Coleman was just another fraudster and plagiarizer who was pretending to have connections to an intelligence service. For example, he mentioned that he had to get permission from higher-ups in order to speak at an engagement. Frauds such as he always seem to wrap themselves in a cloak of deep mystery. One step ahead of his creditors no doubt.
I’m suspect of Coleman’s info and background as well, but he did indeed write a book on the Rothschilds which you can read here:
Coleman borrows heavily from Count Spiridovich’s Hidden Hand. While there’s decent info in that book, its got many many flaws and overly-emotional assertions that cloud his judgement, which is somewhat understandable because the dude fled Bolshevik Russia. But, unfortunately, Spiridovich was a racialist on the Jewish issue and called for a “peace through the union of the white race” in a Newspaper interview: https://tinyurl.com/y69tsdme Spiridovich was irrationally anti-Semitic and accused anyone he ‘perceived’ to be an enemy a Jewish infiltrator at the behest of the Rothchilds ; there’s legit criticisms of Judaism and Rothschild shenanigans, but then there’s exaggerated claims and unsubstantiated polemics which only help Jewish power in the end, of which Spiridovich and by default Coleman fall into the latter camp.
Spiri also attacks particular figures in the Habsburg government for being “Satanizers” and “Jesuit-Jews” despite his sympathies for Catholicism and even the Jesuits (when they aren’t crypto-infiltrators). His evidence in these regards is very suspect and its odd because these figures he has a problem with are always demonized as being Catholic absolutists who are anti-Semities; ironic because he’s charging those same people with being Jews under the control of Rothschilds who are anti-Christendom. In short, they are contradictory claims, and Spiri praises the Holy Alliance as some great bulwark against Rothschild control, but that movement was created by a Theosophist (calling himself Catholic) and some Lutheran-mystic New Ager; also the Rothschild’s greatly benefited from he Holy Alliance (which the mainstream book on the Rothschild’s by Niall Ferguson admits), contrary to Spiri’s claim they were vehemently against it.
The Rothschild’s loaned to everyone in Europe during the 1800’s, Protestant, Catholic, Russian Orthodox nations alike, so none of Christendom is innocent of taking their money, but these loans were always because of the destruction of revolutionary movements destroying Europe; the French Revolution being the real catalyst to unleash these forces, which was perpetrated by Whig-Masons in Britain through people like Voltaire, and its proxy warriors Jacobins; the Illuminati had a hand in it, but not to the degree that most “conspiracy” folks claim. Read E. Michael Jones’ Rise of Freemasonry chapter in the Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, along with Augustin Barruel’s 1st book Anti-Christian Conspiracy, and also Niall Ferguson’s House of Rothschild Vol. I for confirmation on these issues.
The two loans to the Vatican were due to the destruction of the Papal States first due to Napoleon, the second due to the Freemasonic revolutionaries such as Carbonari, etc. and Risorgimento movements. Rothschild always tried to use these loans as leverage for Jewish Emancipation in the Papal States (the Popes always reinstated their restrictions on the Jews when they regained power), but the Papacy did not budge. The Popes Against the Jews book demonstrates the Rothschilds trying to pressure them for emancipation via loans; albeit the book is very hostile towards the Papacy and their alleged “anti-semitism” [the Catholics problem with the Jews was never racial but theological, though everyone in the modern-liberal world tries to cleverly blame them for the racial types like the Nazis].
Just downloaded his Rothschild book. It’s bad. Really bad. The way he writes about Weishaupt and the Illuminati is like a child reciting a ghost story, barely remembering the original and adding lofty sounding fibs because he thinks it will make the story sound cool.
Most of Coleman’s books are dreadful, vapid concoctions of plagiarised factoids, myths and lies embedded in conspiratorial frameworks buttressed by his untested claims of being both a former MI6 agent and an amazing auto-didact But his works, despite their myriad flaws, fit very comfortably into the zeitgeist of 1990s conspiracism and were quite influential in their day. Now, not so much, though a study of Qanon’s “drops” may welll turn up snippets of Coleman’s meta-conspiracies (especially the Committee of 300) that have been appropriated and recycled for contemporary use.
We will see.
With the failed but still on-going coup against Trump, and with the recent death of Epstein, it’s completely obvious that our elected government may be just a facade.
Wealth and jobs have been handily exported to China since Clinton presidency when China entered the WTO. More recently, circa 2008-2016 when people became confused by how many genders there are and which bathrooms they belong in, there’s been a constant indoctrination that if you are against ILLEGAL immigration, then you are racist.
So we have it that our jobs, wealth are to leave us while massive amounts of unvetted people are allowed to come here and live off welfare – provided in part by the heavily taxed middle class.
As Coleman stated, there is a war against the middle class, and against the US Constitution. This agenda is well under way. I fear we are heading towards additional slave-dom (if that’s a word).
So the coup against Trump is both “failed” and “on-going”? A bit like Schrodinger’s cat is it? It’s either dead or alive, though in this case the determinant is what political narrative is required: Trump the victor or Trump the victim.
This notion of a war against the US middle class (a curious bit of economic class analysis) has been a running theme of anti-NWO accounts since the early 1970s, if not earlier. Gary Allen and Larry Abraham, for instance devoted part of their best-seller, None Dare Call It Conspiracy to exposing the how “the American middle class is being squeezed like a vise”. Much of that earlier analysis, however, was more fixated on more nativist conservative themes, such as rampant campus leftism and untrammelled immigration; and the usual bogeyman of international institutions. The economic dimension, alluded to in your complaint about free trade, did not emerge until much later, not until the 1990s when it was too late, and sometime after the much-maligned leftists had sounded the alarm about the impact of international free trade and free market de-regulation.
Anyway, here we are now, apparently counting on a thin-skinned plutocrat, who seems to have put domestic de-regulation into overdrive, to undo it all. What a time to be alive!
Caveat: I really don’t know what to believe anymore with regards to history. It certainly FEELS like there is coordination between deep state people all over the world. I can’t prove it, but as an example, when you see the video clip of dozens of news actors reading the same script, you know their coordination is quite real.
1. I’m still not satisfied w/ John Coleman info. I’d like to know his real name and background. It drives me nuts that I can’t pin down details. He’s the first person that woke me up to the idea that our (US) elections are rigged. The message was profound. Based on what I’ve observed, Trump is definitely for We The People (US) and not the globalist rulers (whomever they are).
Billy Carson (https://www.youtube.com/user/The4biddenKnowledge/videos) is quite interesting also. Though he presents that Trump is related to the same bloodline as all the rest of our presidents. I don’t know if this is true, but it’s mildly scary to think about. Still, I trust Trump. He’s the only one fighting for us which includes fighting for: Western Civilization, Law & Order, National Sovereignty, and our constitutional rights.
2. What do you guys/gals think of this author M.S. King? He seems a little bit antisemitic, but that isn’t conclusive. He hi-lights certain jewish people who were assassins and saboteurs. He presents a fascinating view of history. I’m not anti-jew, but certainly it bothers me that 70% of Jewish-American people vote Democrat (democrats support people who would kill jews the moment they have an opportunity). But these are Americans, not real jews.
It’s been almost a year since your comment…hopefully you get to read it.
A large percentage of Jews vote for the Dems for historical reasons. If I am not mistaken, it goes all the way back to General Grant.
Regarding Coleman’s work, I recently started reading The Comittee of 300. I am about quarter way through, and haven’t been very focused, I was still able to spot some inaccuracies.
E.g. Bernard Levin never wrote “Time Perspective and Morale”, a simple google search reveals that it was Kurt Lewin.
He misspelled the name of an elite Israeli unit somewhere at the beginning of the book.
Doesn’t seem very credible.
Jews have always favoured the Left. See the Bolshevik revolution for an example, which was funded/led by Jews, and Jews made up almost 85% of the first Soviet regime (when most of the damage was done).
Due to their control of the media, they’ve brainwashed you into seeing them as victims, all while they spearhead the charge against historic Christian America. That’s why most Jews vote Democrat – because they vote against Christian America. Yet this isn’t just about so-called left wing Jews. Orthodox Jew Ben Shapiro openly stated that he didn’t give a ‘good damn about the Browning of America’. Meaning that Ben Shapiro doesn’t care if Whites become a minority in America (but you can be damn well sure he doesn’t want Jews to become a minority in Israel).
Nor will you find one single Jewish organisation, left or right, trying to close the borders and keep America majority White Christian. But you will find over 600 Jewish organisations pledging support for BLM – representing most Jews in America:
And as for the minority of Jews that vote Republican, they do so in order to promote neoconservatism, which basically means leveraging Christian blood/treasure to fight desert wars for Israel.
This control of the media is also why you probably have no idea that the Talmud is the most hateful anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind. It condemns Jesus as burning in excrement for eternity and Christians as idolaters.. the punishment for which is death. This may sound far-fetched, but was even laid out in the Treatise ‘Jesus in the Talmud’ by the Head of Princeton’s Jewish Studies Department, Peter Schaefer, and endorsed by prominent Rabbis: Here’s the intro available free online:
There are numerous examples of this antipathy toward Christianity throughout history. For example there is significant historical evidence that Jews opened the gates to the Muslims in Spain in 711 and Constantinople in 1453. These were European tragedies – yet a glorious time for Jews: the ensuing Caliphate in Spain was called the Jewish Golden Age.
Fast forward to today where the Jewish community opened the gates from within again. The 1965 Act which flooded America with 60+ million Third World migrants was the culmination of a 40-year campaign by the Jewish community. The American Jewish Committee first lobbied for open borders in 1914 and later drafted the 1965 bill – named after Jewish Congressman Celler who ran point in Congress.
In turn, the 1980 Refugee Act was also the culmination of a “decades long process by HIAS and the Jewish community to open America’s doors to refugees”.
Jews claim it’s because they ‘welcome the stranger’ but oddly this welcome mat isn’t extended in Israel. Israel even deports its African migrants to America!
What was done with violence to destroy Christian Russia, is done with subversion to destroy Christian America, through mass immigration, Diversity, Marxism, anti-White intellectual movements etc.
More examples of Talmudic hatred for Christianity:
This Talmudic hatred is arguably absorbed by so-called ‘secular’ Jews. Liberal Jews attack Christianity but not Judaism. You won’t find Larry David urinating on a symbol of the menorah for lulz.
Winston Churchill is also on record stating that Jewish places of worship were spared by the Bolsheviks – while hundreds of Churches were torn down and priests massacred in their thousands. The honouring of genocidal maniac Bolshevik Ilya Ehrenburg at Yad Vashem, the most important Jewish memorial to the allleged holocaust, speaks of an enormous hypocrisy that boggles the mind.
Chris, would you please contact me for more discussion off line?
I’m intrigued about this topic and would like to contact you about it. My gmail is firstname.lastname@example.org. Thanks a lot
Colemans’ “work” was ancient…~1980’s. Your letter to him is dated 2008…was he still alive?
May things he wore of have come to pass now that we are in 2021. There are some factual errors in his writings but there are hundreds of facts and he names specific organizations that we now know…years later..interesting how you can be an idiot in your own time and true researcher in the future
Coleman’s website was current when the open letters were first written and published, but that was 13 years ago. He seems to have disappeared from interweb. Perhaps he has retired from such ventures or is longer with us. The two specific claims addressed in these opens letters referred to claims Coleman made in 1994 about having been ahead of the curve in the 1980s, that he had revealed the existence of the Club of Rome and the NRO before the mainstream media did. That he would make such dishonest and easily disproven claims suggests a level of either self-delusion or contempt for his audience.
I am curious, though, as to which of Mr Coleman’s claims you believe have come to pass?
Only a clown would deny a massive global conspiracy today in the era of Covid and the toxic deadly clot shot “vaccines”.
It’s inevitable that an event on this scale, this global scale, will elicit cries of a “massive global conspiracy”, though the response across the world has not necessarily been well-coordinated; indeed the level of COVID or government induced disruption has varied widely. To be sure, Big Tech and Big Pharma have done very nicely respectively out of the upsurge of online activities (driven by lockdowns) and vaccines (though not always mandated); and I guess a more active mind might propose that this COVID event has served as a testing ground for more precisely identifying compliant and less-compliant populations around the world (though again, lockdown and other attempts at population control have not been consistent). But I am yet to see firm and credible evidence that such planning had taken place, presumably in league with the Chinese Government (as the designated source of COVID) and others, to undertake this action for those purposes and beyond. Evidence beyond Klaus Schwab’s opportunistic “Great Reset” bilge and politically-motivated speculation about Fauci and “gain of function” research. I would welcome any suggestions though.
Nevertheless, the existence or otherwise of such a “massive global conspiracy” in no way negates or discredits the questions I put to Dr Coleman all those years ago in reference to his citation of his supposed revelations about the existence of the NRO and Club of Rome as proof of his remarkable inside knowledge and analytical abilities. That he would make such easily disproven claims calls into question (if the obviously risible nature of his allegations had failed to elicit the appropriate level of incredulity) his wild stories about the “Committee of 300”.
Read my piece on Bilderberg, Nixon and China if you want an insight into what I’m trying to do which is to treat what are dismissed as conspiracy theories as claims worthy of serious evaluation as there an element of truth, and sometimes other unexpected elements that come to light, that disrupt the safe, conventional narratives out there. Dr Coleman’s allegations, though, fell short of the mark.