Dear Reader, How Much Proof Do You Need?

“Our attention is always caught when a famous person or widely recognized authority speaks. Use this trait of human nature to help catch the attention of your readers. If a well known person made the statement you are planning to include in your essay, it is best to quote it directly, rather than paraphrase or summarize the passage.”

- CSU Writing Guide, Quoting Well Known Persons

On a few occasions I have been compelled to write something based solely upon an email I received regarding my site. Sometimes it was after I was made aware of additional information related to my research. Other times it was criticism that I felt needed a larger response than a simple email reply directed at a single individual. This is one of those times.

I won't divulge the name or email of the person who sent me the comments, and I won't quote it verbatim - mainly because it has horrendous spelling, grammar and it's poorly written. The gist of it, however, is that "I have no proof" other than "odd quotes." He was speaking generally about my new article on world government and social change agents, but then goes on to include the rest of my site in broad strokes; again, claiming that I have no proof.

Since he brought up the fact that I utilize quotes to support my assertions, I was left wondering exactly what constitutes "proof" in the eyes of most of the brainwashed public. The way I see it, quotes from the elite are the best proof we have. How much more of a smoking gun is there that secret machinations are hatched behind closed doors? The quotes that I reproduce throughout my site constitute an admission of guilt. They hang themselves with their own words:

"In the world as it is today, this institution can hardly be a universal Church. It is more likely to be something like a League of Nations. I will not prophesy. I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might, to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands, because to impugn the sovereignty of the local national states of the world is still a heresy for which a statesman or a publicist can be — perhaps not quite burnt at the stake, but certainly ostracized and discredited"

- Arnold J. Toynbee, "The Trend of International Affairs Since the War," International Affairs, November 1931, p. 809

"Obviously our first step must be immediately to establish and advertise drastic policies designed to bring our own population size under control."

"...The first task is population control at home. How do we go about it? Many of my colleagues feel that some sort of compulsory birth regulation would be necessary to achieve such control. One plan often mentioned involves the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies or staple food. Doses of the antidote would be carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size."

- Paul Ehrlich, The Population Bomb, p.130-131

"Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history."

- David Rockefeller, on record as stating in 1973 about Mao Tse-tung: (NY Times 8-10-73)

"We shall have a World government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

- James Paul Warburg, February 17, 1950, before the U.S. Senate

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

- Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund - quoted in "Are You Ready For Our New Age Future?," Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December '95

"There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution."

- Aldous Huxley's lecture to The California Medical School in San Francisco in 1961

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."

- Ted Turner - CNN founder and UN supporter - quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June '96

"The war against terrorism is a new kind of war."

"This new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions."

- Alberto Gonzales, 1/25/02 Memorandum For the President (PDF); Newsweek, 5/24/04

It's not me who would like to see the world population at "95% [of the] present levels." But I'm not a billionaire, and I certainly can't afford to give away a cool billion to the U.N. to help in my lofty goal of population reduction. My friends and associates aren't the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds and the likes of Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev.

It's not me who reminisces about my colleagues wanting to add "sterilants to water supplies or staple food." My buddies won't have access to "doses of the antidote." After all, they would be "carefully rationed by the government to produce the desired population size." No friend of mine has ever advocated a "compulsory birth regulation." But then again, my peers aren't the most powerful businessmen and politicians in the world, either. It wasn't my predictions on the coming disaster associated with the population explosion that have been discussed at global governance forums, Bilderberg meetings, or United Nations sponsored population control conferences.

It's not me who praises the achievements of mass murderers like Mao Tse Tung. A direct quotation like that wouldn't have made it into my memoirs either. No, I'm not the current head of the Rockefeller dynasty. I have never been the chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations and I didn't create the Trilateral Commission. Time Magazine hasn't labeled me "the prime mover in banking that controls the course of world economic affairs and history." 1 The emperor of Japan has never, matter-of-factly, proclaimed to the press that I "outrank royalty." 2

It's not me who calls for "world government" by "consent or conquest." I've never had the privilege of speaking to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Paul Warburg, one of the original members of the Council on Foreign Relations, isn't my father. No, you see, my old man wasn't privy to the secret meeting on Jekyll Island that hashed out the Federal Reserve System; and once the bill was passed, Woodrow Wilson certainly never appointed him as a member of the Federal Reserve Board.

It's not me who predicted the coming of a "pharmacological method of making people love their servitude" to create a "dictatorship without tears." I have never told an audience of medical students and professors that soon there will be drugs to create a "painless concentration camp for entire societies." Nope, I've never written a seminal work on the uses of psychedelic drugs for transcendent mystical experiences and profoundly influenced the entire generation of the 1960s counterculture.

Its not me who would just love to be reincarnated as a "killer virus to lower human population levels." I have not an ounce of Blue Blood coursing through my veins! Besides, who on earth would take a member of the British Royal Family seriously?

It's not me that admitted to working "discreetly" to "to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world." I wasn't one of the chief architects of the Gospel of Globalism espoused by the Cecil Rhodes Round Table group.

I'm sorry but I have never advised the President that the "war on terrorism ... renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions." I've also never been chosen by the President to be the next Attorney General. If that were the case then I wouldn't at all be surprised if my past record came back to haunt me.

I haven't put words in their mouths. Those statements weren't recorded under duress. A knife wasn't held to anyone's throat to extract a confession. Yet, there it is. I could write a whole book filled with the damning words that spew from their filthy mouths. That's why I refuse to call it conspiracy "theory." There's no theory about it. What part of "proof" don't you understand? If that's what they say in the open, imagine what goes on behind closed doors.

Endnotes

• 1 "Banking man at the top," Time Magazine, September 7, 1962.
• 2 Ibid.