Angelina Jolie Backs International Court
William F. Jasper - 31 October 2008
On October 17, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) hosted a “Symposium on International Law and Justice” featuring actress Angelina Jolie, a Goodwill Ambassador for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and co-chair, with her husband, actor Brad Pitt, of the Jolie-Pitt Foundation. According to the CFR website, the symposium “was made possible through the generous support of the Jolie-Pitt Foundation.”
PERFECTIBILISTS: The 18th Century Bavarian Order of the Illuminati
The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship
Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism
Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith
America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones
November 1st, 2008 at 12:45 pm
While Angelina Jolie does wonderful things for children, I challenge you on your statement above: “with her husband, actor Brad Pitt”. THEY ARE NOT MARRIED. He has made the statement, printed in many publications, that he will marry her only when everyone can get married; meaning gays marrying each other. Hardly a role model as a father. Nonetheless, she and he continue adopting and producing children of their own without the sanctity of marriage. As a former admirer of them both as actors, I find them less than admirable as human beings. Just two more examples of Hollywood immorality held up to all as role models. She was also quoted in American Hunter magazine (NRA) saying she wouldn’t hesitate to defend her children if they were attacked in her home. Admirable, but then would she want her actions to be reviewed by the World Court? I think not. I personally do not spend my money to see any of their pictures.
November 5th, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Betty,
Frankly, in my opinion, the reality of the quality of any ‘marriage’ is the commitment and love between two people; their own ’till death us do part’ commitment to each other.
It appears there are more than enough people who couldn’t really care about the quality of the marriage, the intensity of the love, the commitment of two people to love each other through hard times and to be totally honest and supportive to each other — none of this matters, if the two persons have not gone before Big Brother Daddy Goverment — the Fascist Corporate State — and said ‘Please can you approve of us as man and wife’.
As for those who are obedienct to the State’s requirements, who like docile sheep, drink the Goverment’s cool-aid, no matter the quantity of Jim Jones Cyanide…. as long as they got their little piece of paper from the Goverment that officially says ‘married’ it don’t matter if they fool around on each other, hate each other, married for convenience, cause either is rich, or famous, and so it’s an arrangement of whoredom convenience….. NO SUCH MARRIAGES ARE FINE, CAUSE THE STATE SAYS SO.
Frankly, if there is a God, I imagine he is MIGHTY MIGHTY MORE INTELLIGENT AND RIGHTEOUS AND INTERESTED IN THE COMMITMENT OF TWO PEOPLE, IN THEIR HONESTY, SINCERITY AND TRUE LOVE TO EACH OTHER, AND PROBABLY COULDN’T CARE LESS ABOUT THEIR OBEDIENCE TO THE STATE, IN FACT PROBABLY HAS A BIT OF A GIGGLE AT GOVERMENTS AND THEIR ATTEMPTS TO PLAY GOD, AS HUMAN BEINGS…
That is my view of God’s view on the morality of marriage — the persons hearts; not some two bit little corporate fascist obssessed with pieces of paper drawn up from the little eichmann fascists whose home lives are so terrible, they spend their entire careers inventing ways to destroy families, love, beauty and all things beautiful….
For their sake, I sure as hell hope there is a God; and that he has the sense of humour to be the kind of God, they think he is, and want him to be to them, since in their opinions and by thier interpretations (which they consider infallible), that is how they define him, for their corporate benefits — A FASCIST, SO HE CAN GIVE THEM A BIT OF THIER OWN MEDICINE…
Anyway, it’s clear you disagree… and that’s okay — just thought you may be interested (or not, thats okay) in another perspective..
JMCSwan
February 3rd, 2009 at 3:05 am
Just two more examples of Hollywood immorality held up to all as role models. She was also quoted in American Hunter magazine (NRA) saying she wouldn’t hesitate to defend her children if they were attacked in her home. Admirable, but then would she want her actions to be reviewed by the World Court? I think not. I personally do not spend my money to see any of their pictures.
July 23rd, 2009 at 6:40 pm
Angelina Jolie is not to be trusted .
Once you connect the obvious dots , from Richard Haass ( CFR pres.) advocating less sovereignty for the U.S. and world , a world authoritarian Government run by the elite cabal , the banksters , the globalist who want complete control of the world economy and they WRITE about it , how Countries sovereignty hinders them making more money and the devious plan Haass concocted , if countries want aid for catastrophes , or ” terrorism ” , they have to REDUCE sovereignty . This is what they say . A complete take over by corporatist fascist .
She has OBVIOUSLY made a deal with the CFR cabal , so by default I don’t trusted ANYTHING this anti - freedom ” entertainer” says , why , bcs they have an agenda with EVERYTHING they do , EVERYTHING !
And her support of the Occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan is despicable , sentencing millions to live under the boot of U.S. Imperialism .
And her silly special effects movies suck too !
October 10th, 2009 at 12:35 pm
Why is this article of Jolie in this conspiracy blog??? Whats the point? From the comments, I see someone has gone off on a tangent and changed it to a personal observation of Pitt and Jolie’s lack of marriage. Whats that got to do with Illuminati or UFO coverup or NWO?
November 28th, 2009 at 2:30 am
It’s interesting that no one on any conspiracy blogs take notice of Angelina AND Brad Pitt’s blood relationship to the elite….which is why I think he HAD to leave Jennifer Aniston. Jenn was not part of the “crowd” - check their bloodlines.
Also, many of her movies are about Illumanati bloodlines, how the government lies to us (Changling), and how she is down for the cause (Smokin’ Aces)…..
January 23rd, 2010 at 4:03 am
Personally I don’t think that Mr. Handsome has received enough accolades for his humanitarian efforts. In my opinion a lot of celebrity do-gooders are totally phony and engage in so called good deeds merely for positive publicity. I have to say that I don’t think that George is one of the phonies out there in the world of celbrity do-gooders. I admire what he is doing for the Haitian people. I wish more celebrities were as real as he is when it comes to helping out those less fortunate in the world. So kudos to George and his desire to make this world a better place.