Rothschild and CIA Publications Attack “Constitution-worshipers”
Kurt Nimmo - September 26, 2010
The editors of the Economist have declared constitutionalists mentally ill. “Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century,” the editors wrote on September 23. “When history is turned into scripture and men into deities, truth is the victim.”
The Economist is owned by members of the Rothschild banking family of England. It is run by the Economist Group, a known CIA front.
According to the Economist, the framers were aristocrats who “did not believe that poor men, or any women, let alone slaves, should have the vote.” The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry?
The Economist argument against the Constitution is the same one used by liberal academics. The document is antiquated, the product of a bygone era. The founders were afraid of “democracy taking hold,” so they crafted a document designed to exclude the common people and preserve their aristocratic position.
Tags: Economist Group, Rothschilds
PERFECTIBILISTS: The 18th Century Bavarian Order of the Illuminati
The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship
Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism
Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith
America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones
October 5th, 2010 at 9:55 am
But it does handle the ‘Gay Marriage’ issue.. if it’s not an enumerated power of The Government, then piss off. Government has no business having a say about who gays can marry at all. The Constitution is a LOCK BOX for the Government, not the people.
It’s a list of things the Government CAN’T and has NO BUSINESS doing…
October 5th, 2010 at 10:35 am
Well said.
October 6th, 2010 at 7:38 am
I have to agree with Hardly; the Constituition of the united States for America ratified in 1787 does cover all the bases quite nicely. Even in our modern world; the problem most liberals REALLY have with it, these days especially, is that it demands of individual citizens RESPONSIBILITY in their actions toward their fellows and for their own thoughts, words, and deeds, and that really doesn’t fit at all with their “entitlement” mentality and “situational” ethics, which of course the Constitution doesn’t allow for! As Hardly said, it’s a containment for the Federal government, particularly, and even for state governments to an extent; leaving much even in the hands of the PEOPLE, not just the states’ governments! As for the question of homosexual “marriage”, just because it didn’t draw them pictures doesn’t mean it’s NOT covered; it’s covered under “states’ rights” perfectly. If the people so busy trying to tear down that Constitution truly understood it, and what it gives humanity, not just American citizens, in the SPIRIT of Americans, which clearly none has, they’d be embracing it too. But they don’t even comprehend what MAKES an American… hint:it’s NOT just where you were born!