Unalienable Rights versus Globalism
Michael Shaw (12 December 2009)
Have we abandoned the uniquely American concept of the political, legal and educational recognition of unalienable rights? If so, is there a political movement to restore the core purpose and principle of the American Declaration of Independence?
As documented in Understanding Unalienable Rights, the dictionary meaning of unalienable rights has been corrupted. School children are no longer instructed about this most basic element of the Declaration of Independence. Leading liberty minded legal and “think tank” organizations often fronting the freedom movement, treat or label the seeking of unalienable right protections as outdated. They argue a system of “civil rights” [1] as the appropriate man-made replacement. Think tanks of most stripes quietly argue that the idea of unalienable rights is flawed and indefensible. Correspondingly, the idea has been largely abandoned by academia and intellectuals.
The question then becomes: Can the American experiment in freedom continue without a foundation predicated on the notion that each person possesses a life that is their own? I conclude that without the political recognition of unalienable rights it cannot be assured that the political system will recognize that your life belongs to you.
This is not a moot issue. At the root of the globalist movement is Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. This worldwide program agreed upon by 178 nations, including the United States, reveals the directive that human population is to be decreased by 85% (United Nations; Global Biodiversity Assessment Report, page 673). This policy has appealed to many who argue “overpopulation.” Accordingly, says the consensus, everyone’s “right to life” must be discarded in order to achieve globalist objectives.
Tags: Globalism, Sustainable Development
PERFECTIBILISTS: The 18th Century Bavarian Order of the Illuminati
The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship
Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism
Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith
America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones
August 7th, 2010 at 2:07 am
Too many people in the world, as in too many people using up finite resources?
Nooo…you think?
Of course. Over population is an issue that should of been addressed decades ago. But then, what politician would ever be against babies and motherhood? Nope, instead they offer and promise ever more benefits to parents. “benefits” of course meaning tax breaks and outright subsidies to parents so they don’t pay the true costs to society of their offspring.
“Oh… but children are our future” ………….. I can just heard the shrieking out there now.
Sure they are, a nightmarish, “solent green” future.
Pollution, unemployment, oil/water/food scarcity, constant war in congested areas (middle east), dead oceans, ozone holes, global warming, rain forest deletion, species extinction.. it goes on and on,
and the root cause…….OVERPOLULATION.
December 21st, 2010 at 2:23 pm
We need to deal with anthropogenic climate change and America, in particular, currently uses up more than its fair share of the planet’s resources. Permaculture and sustainable development are our future.