Italian MEP on Bilderberg and Trilateral nominations for EU President and foreign minister
Mario Borghezio, Lega Nord (ITALY), Member of the European Parliament with the group ‘Europe of Freedom and Democracy’, questions the nominations of Bilderberg and Trilateral attendees for the posts of EU President and EU foreign minister.
Tags: Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Videos
PERFECTIBILISTS: The 18th Century Bavarian Order of the Illuminati
The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship
Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism
Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith
America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones
November 21st, 2009 at 2:09 pm
In the subtitles Mario Borghezio calls Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission “occult groups.” In Latin “occult” means “secret,” thus, due to their secretive nature we have come to call to magic mumbo jumbo, freemasonry and the like “occult.” But when he calls Bilderber and Trilateral “occult”, I think he merely means in the sense that they are secretive societies, I don’t think he’s actually a nut claiming that those specific groups sacrifice babies, practice black magic or directly pray to the devil at their meetings (the contention of only the sloppiest conspiracy researchers). I don’t speak Italian though, so I can’t speak with certainty on the common meaning of the word “occult” in that language.
According to this badly translated into English wikipedia article Mario is a bit of a nut http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Borghezio but that doesn’t chainge the validity of his comment. If the E.U is now, esentially, a nation state in the full political sense of the word (whether this is directly addmitted by its causious politicians or not) then it’s president was not democratically elected by the citizens of that nation. Europe might have just dropped off the slippery slope and into the ravine. Happy landings everyone! Hail Caesar!
November 22nd, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Well, the word “occult” has certainly been abused over the centuries. Academia has had a problem with it for a while. Everything that was recently dubbed “occult” is now labelled generically as “esoteric.” If a laymen happens to mention the word occult in their presence, you will be chastised for your ignorance! (I believe “arcane arts” is still acceptable to sacrosanct scholars.) For the rest of us knuckledraggers, we can be forgiven, I suppose, for not realizing that “occultism” - “les science occultes” - was a designation first widely utilized by Eliphas Levi et al., and late Romantics, in France, during the latter part of the 19th century.
No worries: as soon as “esoteric” proper accrues unpalatable baggage, they’ll summarily christen another pc euphemism!