<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Banking Elite Controls World Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=737</link>
	<description>Anti-Theory Conspiracy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 20:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mervyn Jacobi</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=737#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervyn Jacobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=737#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>By the way, you must notice that all the political parties- well both - that have been in power, have sold off public assets, which, under private ownership, have had price rises that do not seem justified. If you look at the list, COR by Robert Menzies, and now unreal price rises. We've had Qantas, our electricity and gas, our land to developers, and others. Also 50 years ago, our City and local councils were not controlled by political parties, nor was the senate, and I believe we had better government, and more concern for the people, then. I am a bit of a believer in the Book of Mathews in the binle, " No man can serve two masters", they give into one and ignore the other, and you can see that the truth is ignored except when issues can be directed against the other party. The "Pledge"required the join any party, means there is no democracy in Government, except by the independents, or when the  members are told "On this occasion, you have a conscience vote", as they were told over the last couple of years by the PM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, you must notice that all the political parties- well both - that have been in power, have sold off public assets, which, under private ownership, have had price rises that do not seem justified. If you look at the list, COR by Robert Menzies, and now unreal price rises. We&#8217;ve had Qantas, our electricity and gas, our land to developers, and others. Also 50 years ago, our City and local councils were not controlled by political parties, nor was the senate, and I believe we had better government, and more concern for the people, then. I am a bit of a believer in the Book of Mathews in the binle, &#8221; No man can serve two masters&#8221;, they give into one and ignore the other, and you can see that the truth is ignored except when issues can be directed against the other party. The &#8220;Pledge&#8221;required the join any party, means there is no democracy in Government, except by the independents, or when the  members are told &#8220;On this occasion, you have a conscience vote&#8221;, as they were told over the last couple of years by the PM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mervyn Jacobi</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=737#comment-7366</link>
		<dc:creator>Mervyn Jacobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=737#comment-7366</guid>
		<description>There can be no doubt that there must be a  conspiricy at work to induce the governments ( certain political parties) over all the world to manilulate the situation ie. Tax levels- to encourage high obese incomes for those who can do it, driving the wage earners - those people who are creating the countries prosperity - to be driven into poverity. The only way to avoid this is to demand - of the people - to place in their constitution, a tax that will restrain those people from trying to take those obscene incomes. I believe that if the tax was based on the provision that there was no tax on the minimum adult wage, and at an amount of 100 times that amount, there would be 80% tax. this would ensure that there would not be another rescession. If you look at the sites on the internet "Tax history of the US", "Tax history of UK", Tax history of Australia"and probably the tax history of any of the old countries of the world, but also "Tax around the world", you would get a very good picture of the worlds trouble. I agree there is a conspiricy, but is it banks, a world news company that has media around the world, or some body we haven''t recognised yet. Unfortunately, it is the political party in power - in Australia anyway - that is the only way of inserting a new rule in the constitution, and they have only attempted to put in clauses that would give them more power and perks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There can be no doubt that there must be a  conspiricy at work to induce the governments ( certain political parties) over all the world to manilulate the situation ie. Tax levels- to encourage high obese incomes for those who can do it, driving the wage earners - those people who are creating the countries prosperity - to be driven into poverity. The only way to avoid this is to demand - of the people - to place in their constitution, a tax that will restrain those people from trying to take those obscene incomes. I believe that if the tax was based on the provision that there was no tax on the minimum adult wage, and at an amount of 100 times that amount, there would be 80% tax. this would ensure that there would not be another rescession. If you look at the sites on the internet &#8220;Tax history of the US&#8221;, &#8220;Tax history of UK&#8221;, Tax history of Australia&#8221;and probably the tax history of any of the old countries of the world, but also &#8220;Tax around the world&#8221;, you would get a very good picture of the worlds trouble. I agree there is a conspiricy, but is it banks, a world news company that has media around the world, or some body we haven&#8221;t recognised yet. Unfortunately, it is the political party in power - in Australia anyway - that is the only way of inserting a new rule in the constitution, and they have only attempted to put in clauses that would give them more power and perks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
