<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Robespierre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4604</link>
	<description>Anti-Theory Conspiracy</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4604#comment-25861</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4604#comment-25861</guid>
		<description>The article is dead on target regarding the hypocrisy of the left, particularly the posturing of what used to be called limousine liberals. What the author omits, however, is that the people on Wall Street he's apparently defending are the descendants of the financiers of both the Bolshevik Revolution and Hitler's rise to power. And, while the French Revolution turned on its own, its animus was a bourgeois initiative to enrich themselves at the expense of the Church and little people, much as what the Reformation in England accomplished two and a half centuries before. Although thousands of the wealthy were executed in France, certain ethnic banking houses were protected by Parisian revolutionary guardsmen around the clock. Funny thing Mr. Lord passed on that analogy, isn't it? I had been a long-term subscriber to the American Spectator until it dawned on me that it's conservative social message is a smokescreen to further its neocon agenda of the subjugation of their own country to Israel in all things, like supporting the obscene wealth on Wall Street, the engine of neocon power, which derives from institutionalized plunder and is the antithesis of free-market capitalism the fascists at American Spectator selectively champion to further their objectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is dead on target regarding the hypocrisy of the left, particularly the posturing of what used to be called limousine liberals. What the author omits, however, is that the people on Wall Street he&#8217;s apparently defending are the descendants of the financiers of both the Bolshevik Revolution and Hitler&#8217;s rise to power. And, while the French Revolution turned on its own, its animus was a bourgeois initiative to enrich themselves at the expense of the Church and little people, much as what the Reformation in England accomplished two and a half centuries before. Although thousands of the wealthy were executed in France, certain ethnic banking houses were protected by Parisian revolutionary guardsmen around the clock. Funny thing Mr. Lord passed on that analogy, isn&#8217;t it? I had been a long-term subscriber to the American Spectator until it dawned on me that it&#8217;s conservative social message is a smokescreen to further its neocon agenda of the subjugation of their own country to Israel in all things, like supporting the obscene wealth on Wall Street, the engine of neocon power, which derives from institutionalized plunder and is the antithesis of free-market capitalism the fascists at American Spectator selectively champion to further their objectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4604#comment-25670</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4604#comment-25670</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey Lord's article was not uninteresting, however his political screed qualifies him as a serious IDEOLOGUE, on a parr with some of the French and German lunatics he writes about.
Jeffrey get a real job, writing for the American Spectator is a cognitive deficient activity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey Lord&#8217;s article was not uninteresting, however his political screed qualifies him as a serious IDEOLOGUE, on a parr with some of the French and German lunatics he writes about.<br />
Jeffrey get a real job, writing for the American Spectator is a cognitive deficient activity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
