<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The due-process-free assassination of U.S. citizens is now reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4562</link>
	<description>Anti-Theory Conspiracy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Exile</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4562#comment-24107</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4562#comment-24107</guid>
		<description>"WANTED, DEAD OR ALIVE." This is nothing new.  The concept has been around for hundreds of years.  Is it morally or legally right? Moot question.  Them that has the gold makes the rules.

Strictly speaking, I doubt the constitution allows the POTUS to request the summary death of a vaild U.S. citizen, but who's going to stop him? Yeah, you and what army?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;WANTED, DEAD OR ALIVE.&#8221; This is nothing new.  The concept has been around for hundreds of years.  Is it morally or legally right? Moot question.  Them that has the gold makes the rules.</p>
<p>Strictly speaking, I doubt the constitution allows the POTUS to request the summary death of a vaild U.S. citizen, but who&#8217;s going to stop him? Yeah, you and what army?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
