Comments on: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward - The Freedomain Radio Review http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4197 Anti-Theory Conspiracy Sat, 25 May 2013 00:15:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Marco Antonio da Costa http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4197#comment-20229 Marco Antonio da Costa Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:23:47 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4197#comment-20229 Hey Pal! You did some good analisys, you checked stuff that i also didn´t even considered! Thank you for the contribution! Just dont like how you underestimate the author Peter Joseph and everybody (like me) wich dont fit into the "credencialism" in order to speak about a subject like free market, wich in our world is so important (the credencialism), but in truth doesn´t mean a thing. And technology DOES steal jobs. Maybe stealing is not the best word, but SUBSTITUTE human labor. I have some examples of that in my family. I like your cepticism, sarcasm. They give extra power to the ideas you attacked. All the best, Marco Antonio da Costa Hey Pal!

You did some good analisys, you checked stuff that i also didn´t even considered! Thank you for the contribution!

Just dont like how you underestimate the author Peter Joseph and everybody (like me) wich dont fit into the “credencialism” in order to speak about a subject like free market, wich in our world is so important (the credencialism), but in truth doesn´t mean a thing.

And technology DOES steal jobs. Maybe stealing is not the best word, but SUBSTITUTE human labor. I have some examples of that in my family.

I like your cepticism, sarcasm. They give extra power to the ideas you attacked.

All the best,

Marco Antonio da Costa

]]> By: Sa http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4197#comment-20212 Sa Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:29:31 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=4197#comment-20212 watched it few hours ago. followed all three parts of it. had a good bunch of great thought provoking stuffs, blended along with some severely argumentative illusions that i might not adopt. a ton of questions floating in my mind trying to reveal feasible answers coping with their arguments, remained inconclusive still. i remember i emailed a bunch of relevant and serious questions regarding earlier parts, impounded with no logical answers till date. i hate current imperialistic monetary-market system as they do; still some part of me telling me to like the idea and the other logically arguing not to. just few of my large chunk of new questions might be(some might say i am tripping...lol!): 1. the current imperialistic monetary-market system owners have history of demolishing every entity that might stand in their way. if some of you are threat enough to them, why they have not taken any strong action on or eliminated zeitgeist, julian assange, or alex jones or few more yet?!?? with due respect, sorry to say that you guys haven't showed much about that the world doesn't already know. are you just alternative strategic deployed players of their potential single New World Order system?!? are they strategically implanting relevant key players in both sides to ensure a win?! 2. how different are, 'a world with many countries' and 'a world with many cities'?! mirror reflection it seems. 3. 'global resource management system'...who would be in control of that management system and what would be the hierarchy?! we all know, all decisional opinions can not be singular, so someone has to decide; who would that be?! we also know, money has no intrinsic value of itself; don't you think the singular power and control on 'global resource management system' would have some significant intrinsic value?! how to decide who to lead when?! the 'democracy' again...:)?! wouldn't that be another scam of politics?! 4. who gets to eat caviar or only potatoes...hang luxury art piece or mere calendar on wall...watch entertaining movies on 100inch plasma tv or just boring news on 20inch crt tv...sail to world tour or only can view sunset from rooftop...who decides about the quality and quantity of final products each consume?! inequality doesn't depend on only as monetary disparity, but also on consumption opportunities. 5. what if there is large permanent migrations between these modern so called 'cities' resulting in overcrowding and underpopulation among cities!? how to decide who lives where!? 6. i could not find or rely on a number of statistical facts it's given. it talked about if a hypothetical similar new earth found...which is not available realistically; rather in this current world, enough damage is already done to create a significant natural imbalance in various regions. how to regain dynamic equilibrium in this already unbalanced natural world as 'Nature is a dictatorship' itself!? there could be many more to clarify...but no offence...i have been a major encouraging initiator for any positive change as always among my peers and students. however, i believe the saying, "hope for the best, but plan for the worst." :) :) watched it few hours ago. followed all three parts of it. had a good bunch of great thought provoking stuffs, blended along with some severely argumentative illusions that i might not adopt. a ton of questions floating in my mind trying to reveal feasible answers coping with their arguments, remained inconclusive still. i remember i emailed a bunch of relevant and serious questions regarding earlier parts, impounded with no logical answers till date. i hate current imperialistic monetary-market system as they do; still some part of me telling me to like the idea and the other logically arguing not to. just few of my large chunk of new questions might be(some might say i am tripping…lol!):
1. the current imperialistic monetary-market system owners have history of demolishing every entity that might stand in their way. if some of you are threat enough to them, why they have not taken any strong action on or eliminated zeitgeist, julian assange, or alex jones or few more yet?!?? with due respect, sorry to say that you guys haven’t showed much about that the world doesn’t already know. are you just alternative strategic deployed players of their potential single New World Order system?!? are they strategically implanting relevant key players in both sides to ensure a win?!
2. how different are, ‘a world with many countries’ and ‘a world with many cities’?! mirror reflection it seems.
3. ‘global resource management system’…who would be in control of that management system and what would be the hierarchy?! we all know, all decisional opinions can not be singular, so someone has to decide; who would that be?! we also know, money has no intrinsic value of itself; don’t you think the singular power and control on ‘global resource management system’ would have some significant intrinsic value?! how to decide who to lead when?! the ‘democracy’ again…:)?! wouldn’t that be another scam of politics?!
4. who gets to eat caviar or only potatoes…hang luxury art piece or mere calendar on wall…watch entertaining movies on 100inch plasma tv or just boring news on 20inch crt tv…sail to world tour or only can view sunset from rooftop…who decides about the quality and quantity of final products each consume?! inequality doesn’t depend on only as monetary disparity, but also on consumption opportunities.
5. what if there is large permanent migrations between these modern so called ‘cities’ resulting in overcrowding and underpopulation among cities!? how to decide who lives where!?
6. i could not find or rely on a number of statistical facts it’s given. it talked about if a hypothetical similar new earth found…which is not available realistically; rather in this current world, enough damage is already done to create a significant natural imbalance in various regions. how to regain dynamic equilibrium in this already unbalanced natural world as ‘Nature is a dictatorship’ itself!?

there could be many more to clarify…but no offence…i have been a major encouraging initiator for any positive change as always among my peers and students. however, i believe the saying, “hope for the best, but plan for the worst.” :) :)

]]>