<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Council For National Policy Interests Backing Kentucky Senate Campaign Of Rand Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3562</link>
	<description>Anti-Theory Conspiracy</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 07:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3562#comment-12599</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3562#comment-12599</guid>
		<description>If you were lurking around, I thought that that would bring you out of the shadows :)

Too bad he doesn't allow comments, eh? Perhaps you can find his email addy somewhere and properly chastise him? 
 
Personally, I like the info you have accumulated on the JBS - because it's genuine and primary material. I also appreciate the look you provide into the entire edifice of right-wing conspiracy theory. The only reason why I linked to the present article was because of the CNP angle. Whatever Lee Rogers writes besides that is entirely up to him ... and I fully anticipated that if you had read his words, you'd indeed have a thing or two to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were lurking around, I thought that that would bring you out of the shadows <img src='http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Too bad he doesn&#8217;t allow comments, eh? Perhaps you can find his email addy somewhere and properly chastise him? </p>
<p>Personally, I like the info you have accumulated on the JBS - because it&#8217;s genuine and primary material. I also appreciate the look you provide into the entire edifice of right-wing conspiracy theory. The only reason why I linked to the present article was because of the CNP angle. Whatever Lee Rogers writes besides that is entirely up to him &#8230; and I fully anticipated that if you had read his words, you&#8217;d indeed have a thing or two to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ernie1241</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3562#comment-12598</link>
		<dc:creator>ernie1241</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=3562#comment-12598</guid>
		<description>How did you determine that the JBS is a "controlled opposition group"?  Is there a set of rules by which you make such determinations?  

Why do you cite Eustace Mullins as having any credible knowledge about the JBS?  In fact, why did Mullins ask the JBS to sell his books in its bookstores if he thought they were financed by Rockefeller money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you determine that the JBS is a &#8220;controlled opposition group&#8221;?  Is there a set of rules by which you make such determinations?  </p>
<p>Why do you cite Eustace Mullins as having any credible knowledge about the JBS?  In fact, why did Mullins ask the JBS to sell his books in its bookstores if he thought they were financed by Rockefeller money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
