Comments on: Zecharia Sitchin: Why You Can Safely Ignore Him http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848 Anti-Theory Conspiracy Sat, 25 May 2013 10:09:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Anaak .Un http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-13579 Anaak .Un Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:57:57 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-13579 Sitchin a fraud !!! ... a fraud i dare to say is all crhistianity , islam and other deceivers like this ... they are not just frauds they are assasins murderors terrorists , holly war !!! killing in the name of god !!! i rather to belive in a Sitchin lie them to belive in all religions true , and the reason why its coz theres none ... how can people be so intelligent for some things and sooo damm ignorant for others ... religion = ignorance ... why do you belive in god ? i ask ! , answer ... > be coz god is god ... lol WOW ... how can one worshiep a deity they dont know nothing about ... at lest I know ... if not everything at least , a lot ... Sitchin a fraud !!! … a fraud i dare to say is all crhistianity , islam and other deceivers like this … they are not just frauds they are assasins murderors terrorists , holly war !!! killing in the name of god !!! i rather to belive in a Sitchin lie them to belive in all religions true , and the reason why its coz theres none … how can people be so intelligent for some things and sooo damm ignorant for others … religion = ignorance … why do you belive in god ? i ask ! , answer … > be coz god is god … lol WOW … how can one worshiep a deity they dont know nothing about … at lest I know … if not everything at least , a lot …

]]> By: Terry Melanson http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-10674 Terry Melanson Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:16:27 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-10674 Read the <a href="http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchiniswrongcontentpage.htm" rel="nofollow">link</a>. Sitchin's errors are taken apart meticulously. Read the link. Sitchin’s errors are taken apart meticulously.

]]> By: Charles http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-10665 Charles Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:50:11 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-10665 Are there any sites that have a list of where scientists, archeologists and so on actually agree with Sitchin? He has many answers that ARE found in science. He admits taking liberties in most of his books, and does not admit exact translations. We have had thousands of years of biblical scholars who still have a text that does not make very good sense...even the experts admit it. Wh yexcept those with something to gain in religion and science, but not ANY of Sitchin's work? We have religious wars and fanatics world wide, and here a man trying to put these ideas together is being condemned for his work. At least point out where he is correct along with the arguments of his errors! religion has an agenda as well...do not forget that! Are there any sites that have a list of where scientists, archeologists and so on actually agree with Sitchin?
He has many answers that ARE found in science.
He admits taking liberties in most of his books, and does not admit exact translations.

We have had thousands of years of biblical scholars who still have a text that does not make very good sense…even the experts admit it. Wh yexcept those with something to gain in religion and science, but not ANY of Sitchin’s work?

We have religious wars and fanatics world wide, and here a man trying to put these ideas together is being condemned for his work.

At least point out where he is correct along with the arguments of his errors!
religion has an agenda as well…do not forget that!

]]> By: Terry Melanson http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-9297 Terry Melanson Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:44:50 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-9297 Sitchin is no Velikovsky. In certain fields, you are either qualified or you're not. Sitchin is a con-artist with fabricated credentials, and his interpretations of ancient Sumerian texts are a fraud. Spend a bit of quality time here: http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchiniswrongcontentpage.htm The "establishment" knew of Sitchin's quackery all along, but in their hubris they deemed him not even worthy to be addressed. Heiser is to be commended, then; for he is sincere, has the right training to even address Sitchin's errors, and was not dissuaded by the political correct thought police to even tackle such a fringe subject. Sitchin is no Velikovsky. In certain fields, you are either qualified or you’re not. Sitchin is a con-artist with fabricated credentials, and his interpretations of ancient Sumerian texts are a fraud.
Spend a bit of quality time here:
http://www.sitchiniswrong.com/sitchiniswrongcontentpage.htm

The “establishment” knew of Sitchin’s quackery all along, but in their hubris they deemed him not even worthy to be addressed. Heiser is to be commended, then; for he is sincere, has the right training to even address Sitchin’s errors, and was not dissuaded by the political correct thought police to even tackle such a fringe subject.

]]> By: Abraham http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-9291 Abraham Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:09:10 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2848#comment-9291 Dr.Immanuel Velikovsky was hounded by the learned establishment because he challenged "the right of their fossilized brains to rest in peace". I have read Sitchin's books as well as a host of other writers like him.I HAVE AND AM STILL doing my own research and I find that these writers have some solid points which the traditional establishment can never accept. Dr.Immanuel Velikovsky was hounded by the learned establishment because he challenged “the right of their fossilized brains to rest in peace”. I have read Sitchin’s books as well as a host of other writers like him.I HAVE AND AM STILL doing my own research and I find that these writers have some solid points which the traditional establishment can never accept.

]]>