In theory one could go directly to the primary sources, bypassing left/right portrayals of what they want you to think is really going on. In theory … if you had no life and enjoyed such torture.

The question unanswered should be: What have the Great Foundations been up to? I’d say they are purposely sowing conflict by using the LEFT to support minority collectivism instead of minimizing differences in favor of a common American identity. This allows them to practice “divide and conquer” politics as was done in the current furor over the obviously Zimmerman shooting of Tayvon Martin.

to truly solve the problems of the world the revolution needs to come from the bottom up for the elimination of the upper crust, the top 2% of the world that control the wealth and the resources and buy the political system, this is where our problems lie… ‘they’ want us dead so that they can continue to do what it is they do, hog all the wealth, resources and minerals…. sstorch

Most of the funding and research gets is carried out by elite think tanks and foundations. If there are contradictions it probably has something to do with defining the boundaries and coopting through “strategic philanthropy.” Along these lines, see a new article called “Liberal Foundations And Anti-Racism Activism.”

However, there seem to be grave contradictions in that the same institutions advocate:

1. Open immigration which clearly floods the country with Mexican which reproduce more rapidly than Anglos and hardly have the physical/mental attributes normally associated with Eugenic ideals.

2. Family planning via birth control and/or abortion is used most consistently by the upper echelons of society, presumably limiting the reproduction of the Eugenic ideal!

3. Extreme “anti-racism” movements, seemingly in contradiction to the “classic” Eugenics movement.

4. Special rights for the handicapped in the USA (parking, ramps, etc.)

5. Rejection of the “Social Darwinism” of Herbert Spencer who envisioned cultural Eugenics proceeding with full individual freedom for all, but NO government “welfare”, dole, etc. He said something like: “To protect men from the consequences of their folly is to fill the world with fools!” To my knowledge, he never posited a Eugenic ideal, but wanted real world failure to limit the reproduction of the “unfit.”

I don’t claim to have answers here. . . possibly the answer is simply conflict in the Ruling Class on this matter. The Catholic Church, whose influencial wealthy Elite members of the Knights of Malta, etc. form an important faction of the Ruling Class, certainly promotes reproduction rights, universalism (not racism), Mexican immigration to the USA, and the welfare state, generally, instead of Herbert Spencer type laissez-faire or Eugenic state socialism (Fabians).

It is clear that the Catholic Church is against Eugenics and related movements. But what explains the contradictions and apparent simple-mindedness in the “liberal” anti-Catholics? For instance, the same liberals who promote abortion and population control seem to fully embrace open immigration and “welfare”, extreme “anti-racism”, “minority organizing” with tons of Foundation money? Pretty futile if their real goal is Eugenics!

MAYBE THEY THINK: In reaction to non-Eugenic chaos which they promote, they will finally acheive their socialist state which will implement VERY DIFFERENT goals than advertised? As the JBS used to say: “The Action is in the Re-action?”

Maybe, but they don’t seem to be getting anywhere, either here, in Europe or anywhere else. Apparently, Europe, including Britain, will be snuffed by Islamic population growth! Good luck getting Muslims to use birth control when their obvious plan is to dominate the world via any means necessary including differential population growth.