http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2644 Anti-Theory Conspiracy Thu, 23 May 2013 01:01:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2644#comment-8513 Terry Melanson Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:37:41 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2644#comment-8513 Print media <a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=Matt+Taibbi" rel="nofollow">hasn't ignored it</a>. Plenty of results show up. But you're right; even cursory search at YouTube, for instance, shows that he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=videos&search_query=Matt+Taibbi+sachs&search_sort=video_date_uploaded" rel="nofollow">hasn't been on a major network</a> in regards to his Goldman Sachs article. Print media hasn’t ignored it. Plenty of results show up. But you’re right; even cursory search at YouTube, for instance, shows that he hasn’t been on a major network in regards to his Goldman Sachs article.

]]> http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2644#comment-8512 Joel Monroe Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:31:57 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2644#comment-8512 Strange to me that I've seen stories reported by the National Enquirer and other tabloids being scrutinized and even analyzed by these cable news networks, but not this one. But I wonder: why not? the cable networks are basically useless when it comes to REAL information about who runs them and the government, but it seems to me that this story would, should actually, have made more buzz. Strange to me that I’ve seen stories reported by the National Enquirer and other tabloids being scrutinized and even analyzed by these cable news networks, but not this one. But I wonder: why not? the cable networks are basically useless when it comes to REAL information about who runs them and the government, but it seems to me that this story would, should actually, have made more buzz.

]]>