http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2565 Anti-Theory Conspiracy Thu, 23 May 2013 10:18:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2565#comment-8332 Justin Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:04:33 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2565#comment-8332 Brendan has obviously never been to Sub-Saharan Africa, where i live. If he had been, he would have witnessed first-hand that the idea of promoting population growth would be an extremely bad idea. Here in South Africa, the current unemployment rate is ~24% and the number of people living in poverty is ~57%. Pre 1994, before the ANC took power, the unemployment rate was ~40%. Does that mean in the last 15 years ~40% of the unemployed found work? No. Post 1994, the (goverment) institution responsible for compiling these statistics decided to no longer include people into the umemployment statistic who had simpy given up looking for work. In other words, statistics can be manipulated to paint whatever portrait of reality you want. More people means more unemployment. More unemployment means more tax for the employed to subsidise the umemployed. He then uses the argument that we don't put enough faith in human ingenuity or industry. Industry isn't going to mass produce food or goods for people or nations that can't afford it. It's simple economics. Supply is only driven by demand when demand leads to profit. Brendan has obviously never been to Sub-Saharan Africa, where i live. If he had been, he would have witnessed first-hand that the idea of promoting population growth would be an extremely bad idea. Here in South Africa, the current unemployment rate is ~24% and the number of people living in poverty is ~57%. Pre 1994, before the ANC took power, the unemployment rate was ~40%. Does that mean in the last 15 years ~40% of the unemployed found work? No. Post 1994, the (goverment) institution responsible for compiling these statistics decided to no longer include people into the
umemployment statistic who had simpy given up looking for work. In other words, statistics can be manipulated to paint whatever portrait of reality you want. More people means more unemployment. More unemployment means more tax for the employed to subsidise the umemployed. He then uses the argument that we don’t put enough faith in human ingenuity or industry. Industry isn’t going to mass produce food or goods for people or nations that can’t afford it. It’s simple economics. Supply is only driven by demand when demand leads to profit.

]]> http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2565#comment-8081 Adam Copeland Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:20:10 +0000 http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2565#comment-8081 But this is a bad idea, the more people the less space, the more war, less food, less things to do, LINE UPS which are already too long. Why Brendan would you want 10 billion people plus? do you think it will save the planet? why if you sit down and the population of china walks past you the line will never end? because there are too many people in the world. Alex Jones (infowars.com) says the rich people want to kill 80per cent of us in END GAME> why would you be a fan of more people why Brandoan? But this is a bad idea, the more people the less space, the more war, less food, less things to do, LINE UPS which are already too long. Why Brendan would you want 10 billion people plus? do you think it will save the planet? why if you sit down and the population of china walks past you the line will never end? because there are too many people in the world. Alex Jones (infowars.com) says the rich people want to kill 80per cent of us in END GAME>
why would you be a fan of more people why Brandoan?

]]>