<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Mainstream Review of Perfectibilists (sort of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071</link>
	<description>Anti-Theory Conspiracy</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blissentia</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-17987</link>
		<dc:creator>Blissentia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 00:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-17987</guid>
		<description>Red symphony: http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&#38;photo=PDFsml_AD/Red_Symphony-Landowsky-1968-30pgs-POL.sml.pdf&#38;id=340</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red symphony: <a href="http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;photo=PDFsml_AD/Red_Symphony-Landowsky-1968-30pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;id=340" rel="nofollow">http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;photo=PDFsml_AD/Red_Symphony-Landowsky-1968-30pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;id=340</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-16236</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-16236</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping. Glad you like &lt;a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Articles/Pike-Mazzini_Three-World-Wars.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;the article&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping. Glad you like <a href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Articles/Pike-Mazzini_Three-World-Wars.htm" rel="nofollow">the article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AugustusMasonicus</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-16095</link>
		<dc:creator>AugustusMasonicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 23:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-16095</guid>
		<description>Terry, nice work on the Pike/Manzinni letter. Your work just made the rounds at ATS and is turning out to be as well researched as your other material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, nice work on the Pike/Manzinni letter. Your work just made the rounds at ATS and is turning out to be as well researched as your other material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blissentia</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-14817</link>
		<dc:creator>blissentia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-14817</guid>
		<description>There are 2 things you could have addressed, which are utterly interesting:

1) Leon Trotsky, in "My Life", said "In the eighteenth century, freemasonry became expressive of a militant policy of enlightenment, as in the case of the Illuminati, WHO WERE THE FORERUNNERS OF REVOLUTION; on its left, it culminated in the Carbonari." (http://marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1930/mylife/ch08.htm)

2) Consider the document "Red Symphony" (an excerpt from the minutes of the NKVD interrogation of prominent Bolshevik and Trotskyite Christian Rakovsky, which had been discovered by a Spanish volunteer):</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 2 things you could have addressed, which are utterly interesting:</p>
<p>1) Leon Trotsky, in &#8220;My Life&#8221;, said &#8220;In the eighteenth century, freemasonry became expressive of a militant policy of enlightenment, as in the case of the Illuminati, WHO WERE THE FORERUNNERS OF REVOLUTION; on its left, it culminated in the Carbonari.&#8221; (http://marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1930/mylife/ch08.htm)</p>
<p>2) Consider the document &#8220;Red Symphony&#8221; (an excerpt from the minutes of the NKVD interrogation of prominent Bolshevik and Trotskyite Christian Rakovsky, which had been discovered by a Spanish volunteer):</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanicButton</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-12368</link>
		<dc:creator>PanicButton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-12368</guid>
		<description>A short note from a freemason.

I will find this book hard to access, but I hope readers find some value in the contents.

Two points:

1. Freemasonry is universal, but not all jurisdictions practise it in the same way. The most common element in their 'modern' mission may well be to take good men and make them better and more serviceable men.

2. ATS as a website is neither Masonic nor anti-Masonic, but every day it proves itself to be un-Masonic, and no freemason would knowingly support its objectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A short note from a freemason.</p>
<p>I will find this book hard to access, but I hope readers find some value in the contents.</p>
<p>Two points:</p>
<p>1. Freemasonry is universal, but not all jurisdictions practise it in the same way. The most common element in their &#8216;modern&#8217; mission may well be to take good men and make them better and more serviceable men.</p>
<p>2. ATS as a website is neither Masonic nor anti-Masonic, but every day it proves itself to be un-Masonic, and no freemason would knowingly support its objectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6827</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6827</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by, for the compliments, and ordering the book. No chance of a hardcover. Too expensive I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by, for the compliments, and ordering the book. No chance of a hardcover. Too expensive I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AugustusMasonicus</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6805</link>
		<dc:creator>AugustusMasonicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 03:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6805</guid>
		<description>Hey Terry, congrats on getting your book out. I did not realize it had been published, I just ordered it on Amazon. I appreciate your kind remarks and it is a shame that you are no longer able to post on ATS. I missed the debates/conversations we had and found you to be very articulate and knowledgeable. Any chance of you turning out a hardcover version of this book?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Terry, congrats on getting your book out. I did not realize it had been published, I just ordered it on Amazon. I appreciate your kind remarks and it is a shame that you are no longer able to post on ATS. I missed the debates/conversations we had and found you to be very articulate and knowledgeable. Any chance of you turning out a hardcover version of this book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6147</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6147</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emsed1</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6145</link>
		<dc:creator>emsed1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6145</guid>
		<description>I logged on at ATS and the thread about Terry's book is gone completely.  The fact that Terry incites that kind of reaction now makes me want to read the book!  :-)

In my opinion there is never enough scholarly criticism and skepticism as far as conspiracies are concerned.  It's unfortunate that most of the overwhelming material about the illuminati is purely speculation and that nobody has taken the time or made the effort before to do what Terry is attempting with this book.

In that spirit, I can't wait to read it with an open mind.  No matter what opinion you have on this subject you have to have admiration and respect for Terry's passion for the topic and for the hard work he puts into his books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I logged on at ATS and the thread about Terry&#8217;s book is gone completely.  The fact that Terry incites that kind of reaction now makes me want to read the book!  <img src='http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In my opinion there is never enough scholarly criticism and skepticism as far as conspiracies are concerned.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that most of the overwhelming material about the illuminati is purely speculation and that nobody has taken the time or made the effort before to do what Terry is attempting with this book.</p>
<p>In that spirit, I can&#8217;t wait to read it with an open mind.  No matter what opinion you have on this subject you have to have admiration and respect for Terry&#8217;s passion for the topic and for the hard work he puts into his books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6114</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6114</guid>
		<description>Thanks. 

I think informed conspiracy theorists have always been a rarity. In my work over the Illuminati, I'm in a rare position that the entire Order's raison d'etre was to conspire, subvert and infiltrate. Theorizing is at a minimum; the overwhelming facts that have not been told (to English audiences) are the main body of the text.

If more people specialized in a particular topic, in a scholarly manner, there are many areas of investigation that can be undertaken which heretofore have been labeled as a conspiracy theory. By taking this approach there is always the chance that cherished beliefs will be demolished, and it is probably the reason why "conspiracy theorists" rarely produce thorough and meticulous monographs  on a single subject following tried and true academic standards. To even begin to take it to the next level - for one - they first have to stop the circular citations - i.e. conspiracy theorists quoting other conspiracy theorists as "proof."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. </p>
<p>I think informed conspiracy theorists have always been a rarity. In my work over the Illuminati, I&#8217;m in a rare position that the entire Order&#8217;s raison d&#8217;etre was to conspire, subvert and infiltrate. Theorizing is at a minimum; the overwhelming facts that have not been told (to English audiences) are the main body of the text.</p>
<p>If more people specialized in a particular topic, in a scholarly manner, there are many areas of investigation that can be undertaken which heretofore have been labeled as a conspiracy theory. By taking this approach there is always the chance that cherished beliefs will be demolished, and it is probably the reason why &#8220;conspiracy theorists&#8221; rarely produce thorough and meticulous monographs  on a single subject following tried and true academic standards. To even begin to take it to the next level - for one - they first have to stop the circular citations - i.e. conspiracy theorists quoting other conspiracy theorists as &#8220;proof.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley S Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6112</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley S Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6112</guid>
		<description>Because it is a dictatorship. 
&#62; All corporations are dictatorships. 

&#62;Already successfully debunked him. 

That's about where I lost interest as well.  Although, I read interesting tibids when reviewing some of Cadbury's last posts. (I usually check my friends' posts).  Apparently Maban died in Russia somewhere.  
Your work in that thread is a great example of why you were so appreciated on the forums, I think.  

Informed conspiracy theorists are becoming a rarity nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because it is a dictatorship.<br />
&gt; All corporations are dictatorships. </p>
<p>&gt;Already successfully debunked him. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s about where I lost interest as well.  Although, I read interesting tibids when reviewing some of Cadbury&#8217;s last posts. (I usually check my friends&#8217; posts).  Apparently Maban died in Russia somewhere.<br />
Your work in that thread is a great example of why you were so appreciated on the forums, I think.  </p>
<p>Informed conspiracy theorists are becoming a rarity nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6111</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6111</guid>
		<description>&gt; IMO, it’s very disrespectful to thrash a thread 
&gt; as it shows that someone on ATS’s staff care 
&gt; little for people’s time and effort.

That's about the size of it. Starting to get the picture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> IMO, it’s very disrespectful to thrash a thread<br />
> as it shows that someone on ATS’s staff care<br />
> little for people’s time and effort.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s about the size of it. Starting to get the picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6110</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6110</guid>
		<description>&gt; ATS doesn’t allow discussions of banned members

Because it is a dictatorship. All kinds of things aren't "allowed." Thus there are numerous excuses for a multitude of actions. A convenience for the oppressors.

&gt; When I do get the book, I will start another thread.

I think it's pretty clear how that will turn out. Either way, I look forward to it, if for nothing but entertainment. 

&gt; Terry I asked for no help in banning you

That's a weird statement: "asked for no help." 

&gt; want to hear what you think, particularly with the Shards threat.

Already successfully &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA317CA317&#038;q=site%3Awww.abovetopsecret.com+Fire_In_The_Minds_of_Men+%22Shards+of+the+Illuminati%22+Knigge&#038;btnG=Search&#038;cts=1239996204021&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=" rel="nofollow"&gt;debunked&lt;/a&gt; him. That that thread has been going on for so long is a testament to the credulity of the people on that board. It is quite the sight to behold. Guy comes along and makes up a load of crap, and you lap it up with glee, humour him and encourage more lies and deceit at your own expense. Classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> ATS doesn’t allow discussions of banned members</p>
<p>Because it is a dictatorship. All kinds of things aren&#8217;t &#8220;allowed.&#8221; Thus there are numerous excuses for a multitude of actions. A convenience for the oppressors.</p>
<p>> When I do get the book, I will start another thread.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty clear how that will turn out. Either way, I look forward to it, if for nothing but entertainment. </p>
<p>> Terry I asked for no help in banning you</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a weird statement: &#8220;asked for no help.&#8221; </p>
<p>> want to hear what you think, particularly with the Shards threat.</p>
<p>Already successfully <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA317CA317&#038;q=site%3Awww.abovetopsecret.com+Fire_In_The_Minds_of_Men+%22Shards+of+the+Illuminati%22+Knigge&#038;btnG=Search&#038;cts=1239996204021&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=" rel="nofollow">debunked</a> him. That that thread has been going on for so long is a testament to the credulity of the people on that board. It is quite the sight to behold. Guy comes along and makes up a load of crap, and you lap it up with glee, humour him and encourage more lies and deceit at your own expense. Classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emsed1</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>emsed1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>Terry I asked for no help in banning you .  I was relatively naive and just wanted to provide a mason point of view.  and answer questions as much as I could.  I think all of us that are active at ATS are seeking the truth and I want to hear what you think, particularly with the Shards threat.  I just want you to know I didn't try to run you off and I am very interested in your work if it can get us to the truth.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry I asked for no help in banning you .  I was relatively naive and just wanted to provide a mason point of view.  and answer questions as much as I could.  I think all of us that are active at ATS are seeking the truth and I want to hear what you think, particularly with the Shards threat.  I just want you to know I didn&#8217;t try to run you off and I am very interested in your work if it can get us to the truth.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley S Steel</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley S Steel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=2071#comment-6107</guid>
		<description>Incredible!  It probably got thrashed because the discussion was more about you being banned than a discussion on the book itself. (ATS doesn't allow discussions of banned members)  Usually, a Mod says to keep the discussion on topic and to refrain from discussing banned members. - the thread shouldn't be "disappeared."  IMO, it's very disrespectful to thrash a thread as it shows that someone on ATS's staff care little for people's time and effort.

Looks like someone over there as a personal grudge against you.  

In your case, it seems to be one of ATS's infamous "stealth bans".  Your &lt;a href="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/mem/Fire_In_The_Minds_of_Men" rel="nofollow"&gt;profile&lt;/a&gt; doesn't mark you as "banned".  Very strange.

When I do get the book, I will start another thread.  I'm sure if we keep the discussion on topic, it'll be ok.  The OP was a cut and paste job from Amazon's comment section.  It shouldn't be too hard to make a better one.

I'm learning a lot from JoshNorton, Masonic Light and AugustusMasonicus myself.  Masonic Light can give extremely detailed specifics, which is always a bonus.  All three are obviously extremely smart individuals.  (ML and I are pretty much aligned politically)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredible!  It probably got thrashed because the discussion was more about you being banned than a discussion on the book itself. (ATS doesn&#8217;t allow discussions of banned members)  Usually, a Mod says to keep the discussion on topic and to refrain from discussing banned members. - the thread shouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;disappeared.&#8221;  IMO, it&#8217;s very disrespectful to thrash a thread as it shows that someone on ATS&#8217;s staff care little for people&#8217;s time and effort.</p>
<p>Looks like someone over there as a personal grudge against you.  </p>
<p>In your case, it seems to be one of ATS&#8217;s infamous &#8220;stealth bans&#8221;.  Your <a href="http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/mem/Fire_In_The_Minds_of_Men" rel="nofollow">profile</a> doesn&#8217;t mark you as &#8220;banned&#8221;.  Very strange.</p>
<p>When I do get the book, I will start another thread.  I&#8217;m sure if we keep the discussion on topic, it&#8217;ll be ok.  The OP was a cut and paste job from Amazon&#8217;s comment section.  It shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to make a better one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m learning a lot from JoshNorton, Masonic Light and AugustusMasonicus myself.  Masonic Light can give extremely detailed specifics, which is always a bonus.  All three are obviously extremely smart individuals.  (ML and I are pretty much aligned politically)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
