<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Former Canadian Prime Minister: Give Up Your Sovereignty To Make The World Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=1858</link>
	<description>Anti-Theory Conspiracy</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Melanson</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=1858#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Melanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=1858#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>He plays fast and loose with the word "sovereignty." That in of itself should throw up alarm bells. 

His insinuations are not clear, and he is speaking as an insider to other insiders. We can't grasp his ultimate intent, because it is obscured intentionally. 

I personally do not trust anyone - anytime - in any circumstance - who would suggest we "give up a little bit of our sovereignty." Besides, it has been proven already &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=Council-On-Foreign-Relations+OR+Trilateral-Commission+OR+Royal-Institute-of-International-Affairs+OR+Canadian-Institute-of-International-Affairs+OR+Bilderberg+OR+Club-of-Rome+OR+Bohemian-Grove+%22Paul+Martin+%22&#038;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow"&gt;which "side" he's on&lt;/a&gt; anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He plays fast and loose with the word &#8220;sovereignty.&#8221; That in of itself should throw up alarm bells. </p>
<p>His insinuations are not clear, and he is speaking as an insider to other insiders. We can&#8217;t grasp his ultimate intent, because it is obscured intentionally. </p>
<p>I personally do not trust anyone - anytime - in any circumstance - who would suggest we &#8220;give up a little bit of our sovereignty.&#8221; Besides, it has been proven already <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=Council-On-Foreign-Relations+OR+Trilateral-Commission+OR+Royal-Institute-of-International-Affairs+OR+Canadian-Institute-of-International-Affairs+OR+Bilderberg+OR+Club-of-Rome+OR+Bohemian-Grove+%22Paul+Martin+%22&#038;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">which &#8220;side&#8221; he&#8217;s on</a> anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mescalero</title>
		<link>http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=1858#comment-5047</link>
		<dc:creator>Mescalero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Blog/?p=1858#comment-5047</guid>
		<description>That really is not as ominous as they expect people to believe. Paul Martin has proposed expanding the G8 to G20 so that other governments can have  a seat at the table when economics and trade are discussed. He argues inclusion, not domination. Jeez, get it right guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really is not as ominous as they expect people to believe. Paul Martin has proposed expanding the G8 to G20 so that other governments can have  a seat at the table when economics and trade are discussed. He argues inclusion, not domination. Jeez, get it right guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
